7/15/25 Chattanooga City Council Budget Work Session - Part 1

Call to Order (1:05)

  • Budget Chair Councilwoman Raquetta Dotley opened session.
  • Administration: Kevin Muhanna (CFO/Finance) and Hanukkah Myers (Housing & Finance Team) presented.

1. Reappraisal Analysis – Presentation by Myers (1:18–59:00)

  • Historic Increase: Citywide property wealth grew $14B (2021–2025), from $24.5B → $38.5B.
  • Assessed Value: Up 49%, now $10.7B taxable base.
  • Districts: Greatest % increases in Districts 9, 2, 5.
  • Drivers: Strong demand, new multifamily/townhome construction, flips of older housing, gentrification of historically undervalued areas.
  • Owner vs. Non-Owner Occupied: ~45% owner, 55% renter-occupied; renters indirectly pay via rent.
  • Revenue Sources: Property tax funds over 50% of city budget; Tennessee law prevents automatic “growth capture” (Truth in Taxation requires rollback to certified rate).

2. Certified vs. Adopted Tax Rate (59:00–1:20:00)

  • 2024 rate: 2.25% → $162M revenue.
  • Certified 2025 rate: 1.55% → $167M (flat + $5M from new development).
  • Holding at 2.25%: Would yield $242M (extra $80M).
  • Debate: Council may adopt any rate (higher/lower than certified). State attempted (but failed) to cap increases.
  • Council clarified: no state cap currently; certified rate ensures same total revenue citywide, but some households’ taxes rise while others fall depending on local growth.

3. Impact on Households (1:20:00–1:10:00)

  • Even at 1.55%, average household taxes rise due to residential values climbing faster than commercial.
  • Average monthly increase: +$13–$54 per household depending on scenario.
  • Owner-occupied homes: Avg increase $161–$800 annually; programs exist for low-income seniors.
  • Non-owner (rentals): Avg increase $146–$533 annually, concentrated in single-family rentals.
  • Renters indirectly affected, though many landlords already raise rents 2% yearly to offset costs.

4. Council Discussion – Key Points (throughout Q&A)

  • Equity concerns:
    • Councilman Clark – burden may fall disproportionately on districts with fastest appreciation (5 & 9).
    • Councilwoman Hill – District 2 residents already carry highest dollar tax load; service quality must match.
    • Councilwoman Burrs – asked for comparisons of property value increases vs. household incomes.
  • Historical undervaluation: Burrs requested analysis of gerrymandered/undervalued neighborhoods (2006–2026).
  • Services & Accountability:
    • Hill & Clark pressed administration: if taxes rise, how will service quality improve?
    • Administration (Muhanna) – agreed quality uneven; pointed to new metrics, dashboards, and 311 system overhaul in progress.
  • County Role: Council criticized County Commission for adopting certified rate (1.51%) while shifting costs to city (esp. schools). Members asked for data on county vs. city service funding.
  • First Responder Pay Target: $23M total needed; $5M already in budget; $17.5M gap remains. Funds would be earmarked strictly for police/fire sworn pay.

5. Next Steps (1:40:00–end)

  • Budget Education Sessions: July 22 & July 29 (police/fire pay focus).
  • Council alignment session: Week of July 29.
  • Public Hearing: Aug 26.
  • Amendment Vote: First Reading Aug 26, Second Reading Sept 6.
  • Options on table: certified rate (1.55%), full growth capture (2.25%), or in-between.